NewsOpinion

Denmark’s Hardline Migration Policies: Deterrence Through Legislation, Detention, and Deteriorating Conditions

jaipo

Denmark, once celebrated for its progressive asylum policies, has systematically dismantled its reputation as a refugee-friendly nation through a series of unprecedented measures aimed at deterring migration from the Middle East and Africa. From seizing refugees’ jewelry to funding anti-migration advertisements in foreign newspapers, the Nordic country has pioneered a model of border control that prioritizes exclusion over integration. This report examines the full spectrum of Denmark’s strategies, analyzing their legal foundations, operational mechanisms, and human consequences.

Legislative Measures: Financial Deterrents and Benefit Reductions

The “Jewellery Law” and Asset Confiscation

In 2016, Denmark enacted legislation allowing authorities to confiscate cash and valuables from asylum seekers exceeding 10,000 kroner (£1,000)[1][2]. Dubbed the “jewellery law,” this policy requires refugees to surrender assets deemed non-essential-such as family heirlooms or wedding rings-to offset state costs for housing and services. The first enforcement in 2016 saw five Iranian asylum seekers stripped of 79,600 kroner (£8,200)[1]. Critics, including Human Rights Watch, condemned the law as “inhumane and degrading,” arguing it weaponizes poverty to deter migration[2].

Slashed Welfare Benefits

A 2015 parliamentary vote reduced monthly benefits for asylum seekers by 45%, cutting single adults’ stipends from 10,849 kroner to 5,945 kroner[3][4]. Married couples with children saw reductions from 28,832 kroner to 16,638 kroner[5]. These cuts were framed as “integration benefits” but explicitly designed to make Denmark less attractive to migrants[3]. Language incentives offered modest bonuses-1,500 kroner monthly for passing Danish exams-but failed to offset the overall financial hardship[3][4].

Externalization and Deportation: Offshore Processing and Rapid Removals

Offshore Asylum Centers and Third-Country Deportations

In 2021, Denmark passed legislation permitting the transfer of asylum seekers to third countries-such as Rwanda-during application processing[6]. This policy, inspired by Australia’s offshore detention model, aims to prevent refugees from entering Danish territory. While operational details remain unclear, the law stipulates that Denmark retains legal responsibility for applicants’ rights, creating jurisdictional ambiguities[6]. The Social Democratic government defended the measure as necessary to achieve its goal of “zero asylum applications”[6].

Expedited Deportations and Criminalization

A 2022 proposal mandated deportation for any foreigner sentenced to unconditional imprisonment, abolishing previous exemptions based on residency duration[7]. Foreigners residing under five years face deportation even for conditional sentences unless it violates international obligations[7]. Immigration Minister Kaare Dybvad Bek justified the rules by stating, “We will not accept criminal acts,” despite concerns about disproportionate penalties for minor offenses[7].

Detention-Like Facilities and Restricted Mobility

Asylum Centers as Quasi-Prisons

Asylum seekers in Denmark are required to reside in state-assigned centers, which range from reception hubs to deportation camps[8][9]. The Ellebæk facility, operated by the Prison and Probation Service, detains individuals deemed non-compliant or facing removal[9][10]. Conditions vary widely, with many centers located in isolated former military barracks or sanatoriums, limiting access to urban resources[9]. Transfers between centers are frequent, disrupting social networks and legal preparation[9].

Travel Restrictions and Permit Revocations

Starting January 2024, refugees risk losing temporary residence permits if they return to their home countries, regardless of how long they’ve resided in Denmark[11]. This policy, amending the Aliens Act, presumes that voluntary return indicates diminished persecution risk[11]. Permits may also be revoked for “frequent travel abroad” or perceived threats to national security[11]. Notably, Norway adopted similar rules for Ukrainian refugees in December 2023, signaling regional policy convergence[11].

Psychological Deterrence: Advertising and Messaging Campaigns

Newspaper Advertisements in Lebanon

In September 2015, Denmark placed ads in four Lebanese newspapers-An-Nahar, Al-Mustaqbal, Al-Akhbar, and Al-Diyar-warning of benefit cuts and strict family reunification rules[4][12][13]. Written in Arabic and English, the ads emphasized that rejected applicants would be “returned quickly” and permanent residency required Danish fluency[4][13]. Integration Minister Inger Støjberg celebrated the campaign on social media, despite backlash from opposition leaders like Uffe Elbæk, who called it “the worst timing for an ad in the history of the world”[12][13].

Policy Messaging as Deterrence

The ads complemented legislative changes by directly targeting populations likely to migrate. By broadcasting reduced benefits and heightened entry barriers, Denmark sought to dissuade refugees from choosing it as a destination-a tactic mirrored in Australia’s “Stop the Boats” campaign[4][13]. Critics argued such messaging undermines international protection norms, while proponents claimed it fosters “informed decision-making”[14].

Family Reunification Barriers

Stricter Requirements for Spouses

July 2024 reforms simplified spouse reunification for Danes returning from abroad but imposed new hurdles for foreigners[15]. Non-Danish residents must now prove five years of full-time employment and “significant communication” in Danish to bypass language testing[15]. Financial guarantees were halved from 144,000 kroner (£16,638) to 57,000 kroner (£6,590), though this still exceeds many migrants’ savings[15].

Temporary Permits and Delayed Integration

Refugees granted temporary protection face one-year bans on family reunification, prolonging family separations[13]. Permanent residency demands include passing advanced Danish exams (PD3) and demonstrating sustained employment-a challenge for newcomers navigating language barriers and labor market discrimination[4][5].

Impact and International Reactions

Plummeting Asylum Applications

Denmark’s policies correlate with a 57% drop in asylum applications between 2019 and 2020, reaching a 30-year low of 1,547 applicants[6]. However, critics attribute this decline to deterrence rather than reduced global displacement, noting parallel rises in arrivals to neighboring Sweden and Germany[6].

Legal and Ethical Controversies

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) repeatedly criticized Denmark for violating the 1951 Refugee Convention, particularly regarding non-refoulement and humane treatment[3][2]. The European Commission has also raised concerns about offshore processing models, though Denmark’s opt-outs from EU asylum policies limit Brussels’ enforcement capacity[6][4].

Conclusion: A Model of Exclusion

Denmark’s migration strategy represents a paradigm shift from welfare-state inclusivity to calculated exclusion. By combining financial disincentives, draconian legislation, and psychological warfare, the country has crafted a blueprint for deterrence that other nations may emulate. Yet, the human cost-families torn apart, refugees criminalized, and vulnerable individuals stranded in legal limbo-raises urgent ethical questions. For now, Denmark’s experiment continues, testing the limits of international law and the very concept of asylum.

  1. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/denmark-jewellery-law-migrants-refugees-asylum-seekers-unhcr-united-nations-a7113056.html 
  2. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/03/03/dispatches-denmarks-deterrence-tactics-refugees  
  3. https://www.thelocal.dk/20150826/denmark-passes-controversial-refugee-benefit-cuts   
  4. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34173542      
  5. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34173542 
  6. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/06/denmarks-immigrants-forced-out-government-policies     
  7. https://schengen.news/denmark-plans-to-tighten-deportation-rules-for-foreigners-who-break-the-law/  
  8. https://www.nyidanmark.dk/uk-UA/You-are-waiting-for-an-answer/Asylum/Where-can-asylum-seekers-live‘/-Asylum-centres
  9. http://refugees.dk/en/facts/the-asylum-procedure-in-denmark/asylum-centers-and-deportation-centers/   
  10. https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/countries/europe/denmark
  11. https://etias.com/articles/denmark-refugee-permit-revocation   
  12. https://www.dailysabah.com/europe/2015/09/08/denmark-sends-blunt-message-with-anti-refugee-ads 
  13. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20150908-denmark-places-advert-to-deter-refugees-in-lebanon/    
  14. https://www.newstatesman.com/world/2015/08/denmark-first-eu-country-planning-run-anti-refugee-adverts-foreign-papers

Leave a Reply